Van Dyke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
In our opinion issued today in Van Dyke v. Bixby, ante 663 (1983), we upheld judgments awarding damages to the Van Dykes, the plaintiffs in that action and in this one. The Bixby case, which we shall call the underlying action, involved the liability of the defendant physicians for a deceased associate’s alleged negligence in the treatment of the plaintiff, Edwin S. Van Dyke. In this action, the Van Dykes seek to recover damages under G. L. c. 93A, § 9, for alleged unfair claim settlement practices of the defendant insurer (St. Paul). The Van Dykes claim that St. Paul, as the defendants’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dodd v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Noyes v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Transit Casualty Co. v. Spink Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Higgenbottom v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Dyke v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Michaelangelo's Catering, Inc. v. KartgatzisMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
- R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J&S Insulation, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999