Legal Opinion

Thomas D. Flood, Inc. ex rel. Plumley v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1963No. 3175Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of violating Section 301 of the District of Columbia Plumbing Code and ordered to pay a $50 fine or submit to a thirty-day jail sentence. Section 301 provides in part:

“It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, to display a sign stating or implying that he or they are carrying on the business of plumbing work, or to advertise by means of business cards, stationery, or any publication, claim orally to a prospective customer, or otherwise indicate that they are doing a plumbing business or are offering to do plumbing, unless they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Judge Lynch International Book & Publishing Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. People v. KnopferNew York City Court of Special Sessions · 1948
  4. Treadwell v. City of Social CircleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API