Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Henderson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 16852Published

1DissentWalters, Judge

Pro Tem., dissenting.

With all due respect, I dissent from the foregoing opinion. The sole, dispositive issue in this case is whether the sobriety checkpoint was constitutionally permissible. I believe that it was.

For a clearer understanding of my approach to this case, a more detailed recital of the facts developed below is necessary. The undisputed facts show that the Boise City Police Department established a sobriety checkpoint on Main Street at its intersection with 29th Street, between midnight and two a.m. on Saturday, May 25, 1985. This roadblock was the culmination of several months…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API