Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McCain v. Acom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

In the briefs, the several attorneys agree that, to avoid confusion, the parties may generally be designated in this Court as they were in the Circuit Court.

The appellate jurisdiction of this Court is not challenged. It is settled by what Judge Tipton, of the Supreme Court, has said in Hydesburg Common School District of Ralls County v. Rensselaer Common School District of Ralls County, 214 S. W. (2d) 4.

The relators below are residents in and qualified voters of Peach Orchard Common School District No. 50, in Pemiscot County. Relators below desired to have some of the territory of the Wardell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Wright v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Hart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Yett v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. Harrison v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. England v. EckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Kugler v. TillatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Consolidated School District No. 1 v. BondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State ex rel. Acom v. HamletSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Dahm v. GoodinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API