Robinson v. Tiemann
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.
The testimony taken by the stenographer in this case on behalf of defendant was never transcribed owing to the death of the stenographer, and is consequently not in the transcript. Both parties ask that the case be remanded. The plaintiff asks that the judgment be avoided and reversed and that the case be remanded for a new trial de novo. The defendant prays only that the case be remanded for the exclusive purpose of taking anew the testimony and evidence on •behalf of the defendant without reversing and setting aside the judgment. ,We find no precedent for such action. But on the contrary in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Garment Co. v. NewburgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Barton v. BurbankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Nichols v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Dauchite Lumber Co. v. Lane & Bodley Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Wilkinson v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938