Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Williams v. Williams

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 17, 2015No. 2140292Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, Presiding Judge

I concur only in the result reached by the main opinion with regard to its discussion of the issue whether the pendency of the husband’s petition for certiorari review of this court’s judgment of reversal "in Williams v. Williams, [Ms. 2130615, Nov. 14, 2014] —- So.3d - (Ala.Civ.App.2014), precluded the trial court’s-consideration of the parties’ claims seeking to be divorced on the basis of incompatibility. The wife argued that the trial court could not enter the divorce judgment because the issue of the validity of the prenuptial agreement governing issues pertaining to property division…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. K.D.H. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte QuinlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Lassitter v. LassitterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Dubose v. DuboseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API