Sharm, Inc. v. Euresti
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.
Relators, Sharm, Inc. d/b/a El Bingo Grande, Transcontinental Insurance Company in Association with CNA Insurance Company, Henry Anawaty, III, and Mike Sharlot (collectively “Sharm”), bring the present mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s failure to quash two oral depositions in connection with the second lawsuit brought against it by the real party in interest, Santos Martinez. We deny leave to file as improvidently granted.
Martinez first sued Sharm for slip and fall injuries on Sharm’s business premises. After Sharm failed to answer that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Galveston v. Gray, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Diocese of Galveston-Houston v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Diocese of Galveston-Houston v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- in Re Mark A. Galvan and Mark Galvan, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- in Re: City of Galveston and County of Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002