Legal Opinion
In re Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Nav. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
C0XE, District Judge.
This is a motion by claimants in limitation proceedings for “an order dismissing the petition unless the petitioners furnish further security.” The claims already filed exceed $4,000,000, and the ad interim stipulation amounts to $90,000. There is a contest with respeet to the right to limit, and it is insisted by the claimants that pending a determination of that issue there .should be an additional security to protect the claimants in the event limitation is denied.
The principal grounds for the motion are (1) that one of the petitioners is now in the hands of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Linseed KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- The SalvoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petition of Marsuerte Compania Naviera, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- In re the Complaint of Babuyan Carriers, S.A.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1994