Legal Opinion
(SS) Hoesing-Schulz v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 28, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01450Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LAURA HOESING-SCHULZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01450-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL 13 SECURITY APPEAL IN PART AND v. REMANDING ACTION FOR FURTHER 14 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 13, 16, 18) 16 Defendant. 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Laura Hoesing-Schulz (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 22 disability benefits pursuant to the Social…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.