Rossiter v. Schultz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court for Milwamkee County. The ease is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Milwaukee county, overruling the demurrer to the third cause of action stated in the complaint. On the first cause of action the plaintiff claimed $10,044, with interest from November 30, 1881; on the second cause of action he claimed $11,860.25, with interest from November 30, 1882; the third cause of action, to which the demurrer was inter*656posed, reads as follows: “ And for a third cause of action this plaintiff alleges and shows to the court that he was heretofore the owner of the scow or steam-vessel named the ‘ Commerce,’ which was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keteltas v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Shipman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Gregory v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Martin v. PughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Glenny v. HortonNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilkinson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Welsh v. Town of ArgyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Hessel v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Goff v. Stoughton State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893