Legal Opinion
Boeing Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Ridley Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 29, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge COHN.
The instant case arises from the Boeing Company (Boeing) challenging the validity of actions taken by the Ridley Township Board of Supervisors (Township) to resolve a number of related lawsuits between the Township and the operators of an adult entertainment facility (AEF) named Smileys. 1 Boeing alleges that the Township engaged in spot zoning and contract zoning in the manner by which it settled these cases. The Zoning Hearing Board of Rid-ley Township (Board) denied Boeing’s appeal, as did the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court). We affirm the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Brickstone Realty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Summit Township Taxpayers Ass'n v. Summit Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Valianatos v. Zoning Hearing Board of Richmond TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Al Monzo Construction Co. v. Monroeville BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Schadler v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miravich v. Township of ExeterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- BPG Real Estate Investors-Straw Party II, L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Township of Radnor v. Radnor Recreational, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Callowhill Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- T.H. Properties, L.P. v. Upper Salford Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.