Legal Opinion

Alitz v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

A highway extending east and west crosses the parallel lines of the defendant railway company and the Chicago Great Western Company, extending north and south, and about 100 feet apart, the defendant’s line being the one on the east. Plaintiff lived west of these crossings, and was familiar with their character and location. On September 17, 1917, plaintiff, driving an automobile from the north, entered upon the east and west road 274 feet east of defendant’s crossing, going west in the direction of his home. He appears to have been alone in his car. According to his testimony, as he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kinney v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Mitchell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Hanover Railroad v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. Jordan v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Simpson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. Schwerman Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Coonley v. LowdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Amelsburg v. LunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Rosin v. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Rastede v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API