Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Murray

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 3, 2009No. S10M0390Published

1DissentNahmias, Justice

1. The emergency application for supersedeas at issue in this matter is clearly moot and ultimately will be dismissed. The issue that divides us is whether that dismissal order, like the order granting supersedeas in the first place, should be issued by the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals. Assuming the validity of this Court’s jurisdiction over murder cases “and all pre-conviction appeals in murder cases” under State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (322 SE2d 711) (1984), I believe that is a close question. I dissent because I agree with Justice Melton that the appeal underlying the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Cheeley v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API