Legal Opinion

Henry v. Roach

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 9, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

We speak of the parties as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff sued defendants for personal injuries sustained when he was bitten by a dog on their premises. At the close of his proof the defendants moved for and were granted peremptory instructions on the ground there was no evidence to support a verdict. His motion for a new trial was overruled and he was granted and perfected this appeal.

Our function in passing upon questions of this nature is well known. In Lackey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 30 Tenn. App. 390, 397, 399, 206 S. W. (2d) 806, 810, it was stated:

“As said so often,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Lackey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  4. Le Forest v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Godeau v. BloodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hood v. WaldrumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  2. Fortune v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  3. Fletcher v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McAbee v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  5. Harris v. Dobson-Tankard Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API