Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Standard Wine Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action upon quantum meruit for services rendered; defense, another action pending.
1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.
This action was commenced September 29, 1906, with the venue laid in Monroe county; and the plaintiff seeks to recover $505, balance due for services rendered by him as an architect, in drawing plans and specifications for improvements to two buildings owned by the defendant at Penn Tan and Crosby, in Tates county. The complaint alleges the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant, the due performance of the work and the acceptance by the defendant of the plans and specifications furnished, and states that the services were reasonably worth $805, no part of which had been paid, except…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gates v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Dunham v. . BowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Wisconsin v. TorinusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. WisnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kent Development Co. v. LiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- National Fire Insurance v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1939
- L. Rosenfeld & Co. v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908