Legal Opinion

Mideastern Construction Co. v. Hamlett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7210SC214PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Of the 48 exceptions included in plaintiffs’ nine assignments of error, 46 are to the exclusion of evidence, for the most part as to Richard Hamlett. Assignment of error No. 1, which is as follows: “The Trial Court erred in the exclusion as to Richard Hamlett of evidence of the contractual arrangements and agreements made with plaintiff, and the matters and things done in their fulfillment, both prior to and subsequent to communications between plaintiff and Richard Hamlett.”, includes 27 exceptions. The exceptions are numbered seriatim at the end of the assignment of error.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. In Re the Will of AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Nye v. UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Barringer v. WeathingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Marshall v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Craver v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API