Legal Opinion

Chandler Telecom, LLC v. Burdette

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 2017No. S16G0595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether an employee may — in deliberate disobedience of his employer’s explicit prohibition — act in a knowingly dangerous fashion with disregard for the probable consequences of that act, and still recover workers’ compensation when injured by that disobedient act. We conclude that OCGA § 34-9-17 (a), as we have interpreted it for nearly a century, may bar recovery in such cases.

Adrian Burdette was seriously injured when he fell while attempting a controlled descent from a cell-phone tower in contravention of instructions by his employer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Retention Alternatives, Ltd. v. HaywardSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Spalding County Board of Elections v. McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Wilbro v. MossmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adrian Burdette v. Chandler Telecom, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Burdette v. Chandler Telecom, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. CHANDLER TELECOM, LLC v. BURDETTESupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. The Avrett Plumbing Co. v. Marlon CastilloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API