Vause v. Mikell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge partitioning certain real property between appellant-respondent A. Miller Mikell and respondent-appellant Samuel P. Vause, Sr., as tenants in common and awarding Mr. Vause reimbursement for a portion of the funds which he contends were spent by him on the property. Both parties appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.-
The issues presented are whether the trial judge erred in: (1) finding Mr. Mikell and Mr. Vause owned the property as tenants in common; (2) in awarding Mr. Vause reimbursement in the amount of $852.56…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Smith v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Huddleston v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greenville Memorial Auditorium v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Wilhoit v. WCSC, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Republic Textile Equipment Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.