Legal Opinion

Vause v. Mikell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 25, 1986No. 0784PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge partitioning certain real property between appellant-respondent A. Miller Mikell and respondent-appellant Samuel P. Vause, Sr., as tenants in common and awarding Mr. Vause reimbursement for a portion of the funds which he contends were spent by him on the property. Both parties appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.-

The issues presented are whether the trial judge erred in: (1) finding Mr. Mikell and Mr. Vause owned the property as tenants in common; (2) in awarding Mr. Vause reimbursement in the amount of $852.56…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Smith v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Huddleston v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greenville Memorial Auditorium v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Wilhoit v. WCSC, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Republic Textile Equipment Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API