Margolin v. Franklin
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ADESKO
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Essco Motors, brought an action against defendants Melvin and Betty Franklin to confess judgment on a promissory note. Defendants petitioned to open and vacate the judgment by confession and counterclaimed for $1,500.00 by reason of plaintiff’s fraudulent and wilfull conversion of their automobile. The cause proceeded to trial. The court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment on the counterclaim in tlie amount of $921.00.
Plaintiff appeals contending (1) the finding as to a modification in terms of payment of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cottrell v. GersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Monson v. BragdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Plummer v. WorthingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Boardman v. BubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mears Slayton Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Michigan Beach Housing CooperativeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Savings & Loan Ass'n of Bangor v. TearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Zinser v. Uptown Federal Savings & LoanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Micro Switch Employees' Credit Union v. CollierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Kouba v. East Joliet BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.