Mabry v. Conocophillips Alaska

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MONTE MABRY, Plaintiff, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS CO., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-00039-SLG Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE Before the Court at Docket 54 is Plaintiff Monte Mabry’s Motion to Strike Benefits Committee’s “Defenses and Affirmative Defenses.” Defendant Benefits Committee of the ConocoPhillips Retirement Plan (“Benefits Committee”) responded at Docket 55, to which Mr. Mabry replied at Docket 56. At issue is whether the Benefits Committee has sufficiently pleaded the defenses and affirmative defenses contained in its Answer…