Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wylie

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1948No. 16042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fishburne, J.:

The complaint in this cause was hied by W. Bruce Williams and James H. Howey, appellants here, as citizens and taxpayers of the county of Lancaster, on behalf of themselves and all other taxpayers and citizens of the county. The complaint assails the validity of a certain deed of conveyance executed and delivered by the Board of County Commissioners for the county of Lancaster, to Louise P. Wylie, as executrix, and John D. Wylie, as executor, both of whom, together with the County Commissioners, are named as defendants. It is sought to have this deed cancelled and declared null…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Sechrist v. Rialto Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cathcart v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Williams v. WylieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Williams v. WylieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API