Legal Opinion

Cabral v. Victor & Provost, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 29, 1934No. 32493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

Mrs. Peter Cabral, a married woman, obtained judgment by default against the maker and indorsers of a promissory note. One of the indorsers, Dr. J. O. Weilbaecher, has appealed from the judgment, and, in this court, has filed an exception of no cause or right of action.

The exception is based upon the contention that the allegations made in Mrs. Cabral’s petition, that she was a married woman, and that she had purchased the note, were the same as to say that the note belonged to the matrimonial community between her and her husband and not to her alone.

Of course, if Mrs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Succession of HowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Williams v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Cooper v. CappelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Mitchell v. Dixie Ice Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Rocques v. FreemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duke v. Gregory-Salisbury & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Strange v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Alsaya v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Alsaya v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Haas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API