Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Feinberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to compel her husband to comply with the terms of a separation agreement heretofore entered into between them, as reformed by a judgment' of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered upon consent on November 13, 1942, so as to change the beneficiary clauses in two insurance policies. One of these policies was issued by New York Life Insurance Company and the other by Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, and those companies have been joined as parties defendant so as to make effective the relief sought. The defendant husband has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Canfield v. Elmer E. Harris & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. In re the Estate of GrierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feinberg v Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API