Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Williams, 109 AD3d 490 [2013]; People v Smith, 101 AD3d 761 [2012]; People v Cooke, 94 AD3d 1138 [2012]).

The period of postrelease supervision imposed at resentencing was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API