Legal Opinion
Evdokias v. Oppenheimer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 6, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover dam*599ages, inter alia, for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated May 24, 1985, which granted the respective motions of the defendants Charles Banks and Samuel Zimmer and the cross motion of the defendant Kurt Oppenheimer to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint as to them on the ground of forum non conveniens.
Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Special Term properly exercised its discretion in granting the respondents’ respective motions and cross motion for dismissal of the complaint on the ground of forum…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Bader & Bader v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bewers v. American Home Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bewers v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- World Point Trading PTE., Ltd. v. ItalianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brinson v. Chrysler FinancialAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Continental Insurance v. Polaris Industries PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Jackam v. Nature's Bounty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Troni v. Di MilanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.