Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Deloach v. Fara Insurance Services

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2014No. 14-408Published

1ConcurrenceAmy, J.

Ill agree with the majority that an affirmation is warranted in this case and with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court inappropriately shifted the burden of proof to the claimant, thus warranting a de novo review. See Tulane Univ. Hosp. & Clinic v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 11-179 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/29/11), 70 So.3d 988. However, I write separately in light of my view of the interplay between La.R.S. 23:1121 and La.R.S. 23:1201(F).

Ms. Deloach’s disputed claim for compensation requested a determination regarding FARA’s denial of her choice of physician as well as penalties and attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Krogh v. Tri-State RefrigerationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API