Legal Opinion

In re David

New York County Courts

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by E. W. Cushman, to amend an order, made herein, 'on April 18, 1904, so that, in addition to the allowances therein made, an. allowance may be made to him, as attorney for Sarah M. Morgan, as costs for services and disbursements in the above-entitled matter, in such a sum as the court shall deem reasonable and just.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

By the decision of the commissioners, appointed to determine as to the necessity of the highway mentioned in the petition, and to assess the damages by reason of the laying out of such highway, it was certified and determined that it is necessary that the highway be laid out, and the damages were assessed as follows: William Blair, $238.40; Sarah M. Morgan, $342.18; Orril Hayward, $301.50.

On motion to confirm the decision of the commissioners, the supervisor and the highway commissioner appeared in opposition, and on the 18th of March, 1904, an order was made by this court, vacating and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rogers v. . Common Council of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Shattuck v. . BascomNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. In re the Executive Communication of the 1st of February, 1872Supreme Court of Florida · 1872
  4. Matter of De CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. People ex rel. Ottman v. Commissioners of Highways of SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Thompson, New York County Courts1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API