Legal Opinion

Brantner v. Papish

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 11, 1942No. 14,934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bock

In this case the caveator, a son and heir at law of Barbara Brantner, deceased, contests her will on the sole ground of alleged undue influence exercised over her by proponent and sole beneficiary thereunder, who also is a son and heir at law of deceased. The court, over objections of caveator, sustained proponent’s motion for a directed verdict, based upon the ground of insufficient evidence, and judgment was entered admitting the will to probate. Reversal is sought by writ of error. The material points urged for reversal will be considered under the ruling of the court granting the motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ShapterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Prewitt v. LambertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Cree v. BeckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. C. A. Jackson, Inc. v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. DeLeonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Estate of Freeman v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. Brantner v. PapishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Estate of Freeman v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Tompkins v. DeLeonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API