Legal Opinion

WEIR v. PIERRE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00722Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLAS WEIR, ) ) ) 2:25-cv-722 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOYCE PIERRE, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Nicholas Weir’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF 4). For the reasons below, the Court denies Mr. Weir’s motion. “Preliminary injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy and should be granted only in limited circumstances.” Kos Pharms., Inc. v. Andrx Corp.,

369 F.3d 700, 708

(3d Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). “A party seeking a [TRO] must show: (1) a likelihood of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Goodson v. MaggiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API