Graham v. Eminent Household
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition-for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Eulton superior ■court. April 303l19T0. John C. Graham, E. S. Perry, and R. D. Murphy brought their •equitable petition against Peter E. Clarke, J. G. St. Amand, P. E. Murray, L. P. Binford, E. E. Temple, W. A. Jackson Jr., George W. Clayton, J. B. Erost, C: M. Hitch, and the Eminent Household ■of Columbian Woodmen, a corporation chartered under the laws of Georgia, and hereinafter referred to as the corporation, or the order.
Read the full summary
Petition-for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Eulton superior ■court. April 303l19T0. John C. Graham, E. S. Perry, and R. D. Murphy brought their •equitable petition against Peter E. Clarke, J. G. St. Amand, P. E. Murray, L. P. Binford, E. E. Temple, W. A. Jackson Jr., George W. Clayton, J. B. Erost, C: M. Hitch, and the Eminent Household ■of Columbian Woodmen, a corporation chartered under the laws of Georgia, and hereinafter referred to as the corporation, or the order. Copy of the petition for incorporation and of the certificate ■of the secretary of State is attached. The corporation is a…
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
As will be seen by reference to the case of Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Thornton, 134 Ga. 405 (67 S. E. 849), and the statement of the issues involved in that case and the evidence introduced touching the issues arising there, the statement of facts as set forth there may be considered in connection with the preceding statement of facts made in the case at bar. The former statement of facts throws additional light upon certain phases of the struggle between two factions in the order, which has culminated in a test of the right of the Eminent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eminent Household v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910