Legal Opinion

Tarbox v. Walters

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 28681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

This case is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to quash the return of service of summons.

Service was attempted to be made upon defendant by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with R. LaMonte, President of Coast to Coast Hit Record Company, 5541 Baltimore Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa., by whom defendant was employed.

Plaintiff relies upon F.R.Civ.P. 4(d) (7), 28 U.S.C., which provides, inter alia, “ * * * ajso sufficient if the summons and complaint are served * * * in the manner prescribed by the law of the state in which the service…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Branch v. FoortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giordani v. HoffmannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. In Re ButtsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Cresswell v. Walt Disney ProductionsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Murphy v. Helena Rubinstein Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  5. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Steve Szukhent and Robert SzukhentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API