Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chris Mac Co. v. Johnson-Ono

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 18, 2000Published

1DissentDavis, J.

I respectfully dissent. Civil Court did

not abuse its discretion in conditioning the discontinuance of these consolidated holdover proceedings upon landlord’s payment of tenants’ legal fees.

In March 1997, landlord commenced these two holdover proceedings alleging that respondents illegally removed the *526wall between their two apartments to create one unit. Fourteen months later, on the May 20, 1998 scheduled trial date, landlord made an oral application to discontinue both proceedings. It is not disputed that in response to this application tenants’ attorney requested that legal fees be awarded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Beigel v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Glover Bottled Gas Corp. v. Local 282, IBTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Poland v. B. & N. Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Best v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API