Legal Opinion

Southwestern Port Huron Co. v. Wilber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1907No. 14,865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The defendant in error brought this action in the district court’.of Douglas county to recover from the Southwestern Port Huron Company $700, which he claimed was due him on account of the sale pf a road-roller under a written contract of agency. The ipsu.es were tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of Wilber for $382 and costs. To reverse, this judgment the company brings the case here. '

The only objection urged to the judgment is that it is not sustained by the evidence; that, on the contrary, the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Plant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Lunney v. HealeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gillett v. CorumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andreae v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Cessna Aircraft Company, a Corporation v. Aviation, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Ryan v. StrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Byrd v. Bruce-Jones Live Stock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API