Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Mungen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This case was decided by the court En Banc. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Whitfield, C. J.

It is earnestly suggested in a petition for rehearing that the court overlooked some of the features of this case that would affect the result. But this is not justified aS a most careful consideration was given to every aspect of the case. The proceeding is not collateral but direct, and the paramount object of the *536bill is not to decree a title in the appellee by declaring her an heir of her father and by divesting the heirs of the trustee of a legal estate; but apparently the dona fide object of the suit is the partition of land between common owners thereof,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camp Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Schroeder v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of McGintySupreme Court of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API