Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 2003No. 5D02-2031Published

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

Sirmontay Ford was found guilty by jury verdict of robbery with a firearm. Ford contends that the trial judge’s failure to give' a complete instruction on the issue of his alibi requires a new trial. We agree, vacate the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial.

The victim testified that he was walking home from his girlfriend’s apartment around midnight when a person exited a white four-door Pontiac with dark tinted widows. That person was wearing all black clothing, had dread locks and a bandana on his head that covered his forehead. Nevertheless, the victim testified that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Henderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ramsaran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Rostano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API