Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barron v. Liberty National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1925No. 11782Published

1DissentJustice Marion

I think, under the express terms of this policy, Barron, the insured, had a' perfect right to assign the policy without the consent of the beneficiary, and that the pledge of the policy with the bank was, as between the pledgee and Barron or any one claiming under him, as beneficiary or otherwise, a valid transfer of the policy. The conditions of the policy contract as to form of an assignment, etc., were intended for the benefit and protection of the company (25 Cyc. 770, 771, 772), not for the protection of the beneficiary who, at the time of the pledge, had only an expectant, not a vested,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bost v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API