Clevinger v. Hill

*498OPINION of the Court, by

Cli. J. Boyxe.

This ⅛ an appeal from á judgment for the plaintiff in an ac-^011 of ejectment. The questions arising in the case grow out of bills of exception taken by the defendants ⅛ the progress of the trial in the court helow.

^yrc have no doubt that the court below decided erroneously that the deed to the lessor of the plaintiff, purporting to be executed by the heirs of the patentee, under which the plaintiff derived title, Vas prima facie evidence of the fact that they were the heirs of the pa-teatee. The question whether they were the heirs of the *499patentee,…