Legal Opinion

State v. Maskell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 1990No. C86-04-31818, C88-10-37330, C88-11-37420; CA A60625, A60626, A60627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for arson, assigning as error the denial of his motion to suppress. He contends that his confessions were involuntary and that their admission at his trial violated Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.1 We reverse and remand.

Detective Greisen visited defendant at his residence to inquire about a fire in the neighborhood. Defendant is mentally retarded. After Greisen read him the Miranda rights, defendant said that he had not been involved. Greisen asked him to take a polygraph examination.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VuOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API