Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of Pacific Inland Navigation Co.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 10, 1967No. Civ. 2581PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON CLAIMANT’S MOTION TO INCREASE SECURITY
TAVARES, District Judge.
On September 16, 1966, the Diesel Tug SHINN was proceeding from Pier 24, Honolulu Harbor, to Pier 32, Honolulu, for the purpose of refueling the Tug. In the course of the voyage the SHINN struck the Japanese Fishing Vessel KUNI MARU No. 3, hereinafter called KUNI MARU. Both vessels were dam aged and some injuries were sustained by the crew members of the Tug.
The owners of the KUNI MARU have claimed damage of approximately $167,-000.00.
Pacific Inland Navigation Co., Inc., hereinafter called Pacific, representing that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Complaint of Harbor Towing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- In The Matter Of Cross Contracting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Pettus v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Complaint of Ta Chi Navigation (Panama) Corp. SaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Carolina Floral Import, Inc. v. M. V. EurypylusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.