Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Peters

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 19, 1998No. 98 C 3273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge.

Presently before us is defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Arthur Catlett pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

According to his complaint, Catlett is a former employee of the Illinois Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, which is now part of the Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS). He worked for that agency as a Mental Health Technician from May 16, 1989, through August 5, 1997, when he was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  2. ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API