Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Sathre v. Hopton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1936No. File No. 6351Published

1DissentBurr, J.

Eor several years the tillable land of this state was taxed to create a permanent surplus fund for the protection of crops against hail, and now, through the medium of chapter 155 of the Session Laws of 1935, the legislature seeks to divert to the state equalization fund, for an entirely different purpose, over one million dollars of this fund, upon the theory that the purpose for which the tax was levied has been accomplished and that this amount is surplus.

It is not disputed that where a fund is created by taxation for a certain definite, specific object, and this object is accomplished,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Field v. StroubeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Goer v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Auditor General v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Brye v. DaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API