Legal Opinion
Montreal Trading Ltd. v. Amax Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1981No. 79-1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Montreal Trading Ltd., a Canadian corporation, brought this antitrust action against several United States potash producers, alleging that Montreal Trading was unable to purchase potash to sell to its customers because the defendants were engaged in a concerted refusal to deal with Montreal Trading and had deliberately limited potash production to drive up prices. Montreal Trading now appeals an adverse jury verdict finding that it suffered no damages. It argues on appeal the impropriety of a jury instruction precluding damages for any potash withheld from Montreal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- The IN PORTERS, SA v. Hanes Printables, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Earl E. Thompson, Sr. v. Henry T. Haynes, Fluid Controls, Inc., and Mighty Clean CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.