Legal Opinion

Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonald

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1998No. 98-3220Published

1Per curiam

We summarily dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the challenged order denying Petitioner’s motion to amend its answer to add a demand for jury trial. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We also certify conflict with Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. Pate, 563 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Quality Coffee Service, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 474 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); and Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Lindsey v. ShermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Quality Coffee Servoce, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-ColaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. PateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API