Legal Opinion

Jaimes v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 6, 1989No. C74-68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

McQUADE, District Judge.

This case is before the court on remand from the Sixth Circuit for a specific finding on the extent, if any, of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s [“HUD”] liability. In deciding this issue, the court has considered the following briefs submitted by the parties: Plaintiffs’ Memorandum on the Merits Establishing HUD’s Liability for Racial Segregation of LMHA’s Public Housing Projects, Brief of LMHA Defendants Regarding Liability of HUD Defendants, Federal Defendants’ Memorandum with Respect to HUD’s Liability, Reply Brief of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., Northwest Opportunity Center and Eluteria D. Maldonado, Intervening v. Village of Arlington HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Debolt v. EspyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  2. Liddy v. CisnerosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Project B.A.S.I.C. v. KempDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API