Royster v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 327.] ROYSTER, APPELLANT, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Royster v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.,

2001-Ohio-212.] Consumer sales practices—Nonconforming new motor vehicles—Lemon Law— Consumers enjoy a presumption of recovery under R.C. 1345.73(B), when. (No. 00-1076—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided June 28, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 75634. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A consumer enjoys a presumption of recovery under R.C. 1345.73(B) if…