Legal Opinion

Cole v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1936No. 24737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

It is true that "it is the well-settled general rule that a riparian proprietor has a right to have the water of a stream flow down to his land as it is wont to run, in its natural mode and course, undiminished in quantity and unimpaired in quality” (27 R. C. L. 1091, § 30), and that, “as against riparian owners below, upper proprietors are entitled to have the water flow from their lands to the same extent” (27 R. O. L. 1093, § 30), and therefore that a lower riparian owner will not be allowed to do any acts such as are not necessary and legitimate for use and enjoyment of his abutting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Williams v. Columbus Producing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beals v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Bracey v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Beals v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API