Cole v. Bradford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
It is true that "it is the well-settled general rule that a riparian proprietor has a right to have the water of a stream flow down to his land as it is wont to run, in its natural mode and course, undiminished in quantity and unimpaired in quality” (27 R. C. L. 1091, § 30), and that, “as against riparian owners below, upper proprietors are entitled to have the water flow from their lands to the same extent” (27 R. O. L. 1093, § 30), and therefore that a lower riparian owner will not be allowed to do any acts such as are not necessary and legitimate for use and enjoyment of his abutting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Williams v. Columbus Producing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beals v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Bracey v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Beals v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986