Legal Opinion

Michelin Tire Corp. v. County of San Mateo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1976No. Civ. 36210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Plaintiff, an importer of tires from Europe, has appealed from a judgment which denied it recovery of personal property taxes of $28,035.49 paid to defendant county under protest for the fiscal year 1972-1973. On appeal it contended that the goods assessed enjoyed an immunity from taxation under article I, section 10, clause 2 of the United States Constitution, 1 as interpreted in Brown v. Maryland (1827) 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 [6 L.Ed. 678], and Low v. Austin (1871) 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 29 [20 L.Ed. 517], and that such immunity was not lost because the tires were unloaded from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Low v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Wages v. Michelin Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schettler v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Japan Food Corp. v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API