Legal Opinion
Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Maine Agricultural Bargaining Board
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 15, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
The Petitioner, Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (Bayside), appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Waldo County) affirming a decision of the Respondent, Maine Agricultural Bargaining Board (the Board). In its decision the Board declared the Respondent, Pine Tree Poultry Bargaining Committee (Pine Tree), to be a qualified association of poultry producers under the Maine Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Act (the Act), 13 M.R.S.A. §§ 1953-1965 (1981). On appeal Bayside challenges Pine Tree’s qualification to act as bargaining agent for Maine poultry producers, while the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cyr v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Town of Windham v. LaPointeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- New England Whitewater Center, Inc. v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- In re Child of Radience K.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Oronoka Restaurant, Inc. v. Maine State Liquor CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.