Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hayes v. De Barton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2017No. CA 16-541Published

1DissentChatelain, Judge

|,In this uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) case, the majority reverses the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Lonny Hayes, individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor child, Garret Hayes, and Melissa Hayes. In doing so, a majority of the panel and the concurring judge, respectively, find the 2007 and 2011 UM waivers of O’Neal’s Feeder Supply, Inc. (“O’Neal’s”) valid; accordingly, they find Penn Millers Insurance Company (“Penn Millers”) issued O’Neal’s’ a commercial auto policy with no UM coverage. For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent.

As more…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API