City of Providence v. S & J 351, INC.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentFlanders, Justice
I respectfully dissent because the motion justice who dismissed the District Court appeal filed by the petitioners, S & J 351, Inc., and Prinz Eugen, Ltd. (collectively, the lessee), failed to consider the effect of the parties’ course of performance during the lease term on the rental due-date provisions of the written lease. This omission could materially affect any decision on whether the lessee’s rent payments were timely during the District Court appeal.3 Therefore, I would grant the lessee’s petition for certiorari and remand this case to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Versailles Arms Apartments v. PeteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Protean Investors, Inc. v. Travel, Etc., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Arcade Co. v. Kentco, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
- Spencer v. BlackmonHamilton County Municipal Court · 1985