Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Providence v. S & J 351, INC.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 23, 1997No. 96-475-M.PPublished

1DissentFlanders, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the motion justice who dismissed the District Court appeal filed by the petitioners, S & J 351, Inc., and Prinz Eugen, Ltd. (collectively, the lessee), failed to consider the effect of the parties’ course of performance during the lease term on the rental due-date provisions of the written lease. This omission could materially affect any decision on whether the lessee’s rent payments were timely during the District Court appeal.3 Therefore, I would grant the lessee’s petition for certiorari and remand this case to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Versailles Arms Apartments v. PeteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Protean Investors, Inc. v. Travel, Etc., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Arcade Co. v. Kentco, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  4. Spencer v. BlackmonHamilton County Municipal Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API